Union brings attention to alleged worker mistreatment at Ion construction site
The Rice Management Company’s current construction of the Ion in the Third Ward has continued to spark controversy within the community. During the past year of ongoing construction, the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades has brought attention to the alleged mistreatment of workers from Milam & Co Painters, a company subcontracted by Rice for the Ion construction project.
According to Salvador Herrera, director of organizing for IUPAT, workers from Milam & Co Painting have expressed concern about low wages, lack of rest breaks, pressure from foremen, and, in one case, sexual harassment. A living wage in Houston is $17/hour, according to Herrerra, and the workers from Milam & Co painting are paid $14/hour.
The Houston Coalition for Equitable Development without Displacement and IUPAT held a car rally to protest this issue at the Ion construction site on March 7. According to Herrera, the purpose of the rally was to bring to light the issue of worker mistreatment at the construction site.
“We used our first amendment rights to let the public know that Rice University is hiring irresponsible contractors,” Herrera said. “We, in coalition with the community members, tried to get Rice University to hold Milam & Co Painting accountable … [Rice] should build responsibly, and use responsible contractors.”
According to Herrera, the Rice Management Company has the power to set standards and stipulations for the companies they contract for work. Herrera said, as the developer, the Rice Management Company can and should ask Milam & Co Painting to address these issues.
Sam Dike, Rice Management Company’s manager of strategic initiatives, stated that the company’s priority is to ensure that all of their contractors and their subcontractors are paying people in accordance with federal and state laws.
“My understanding is that [the company] pays people well above minimum wage,” Dike said. “Whether that constitutes a living wage in the eyes of the union, is in the eyes of the union.”
Dike also said that to his understanding, Milam & Co workers are not only allowed, but also encouraged to take rest and water breaks throughout the day.
The construction of the Ion is a C3 (construction, career, collaborative) project, so its workers are meant to comply with the industry-wide standards set by the C3 nonprofit agency. According to Dike, when allegations were first brought up against Milam & Co Painting last fall, C3 had done on-site interviews with two employees from Milam & Co and did not find anything that substantiated the claims that had been made.
“People can make allegations but what has happened to substantiate those claims … has evidence been brought forward?” Dike said.
According to Dike, the Rice Management Company does not get involved in personal disputes between private parties and would only get involved if there was a case of a violation of federal or state law, which to Dike’s knowledge, is currently not the case.
“If there were substantiated claims of violation of federal and state law, that’s something that we would have to take into consideration in terms of our relationship with that particular partner,” Dike said.
In the past, according to Herrera, Milam & Co Painting was under investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor for Fair Labor Standards Act violations, but Herrera was never notified of the outcomes of these investigations. According to Herrera, subtle retaliation by the company has made it harder for workers to publicly express their concerns.
“Milam employees like to maintain a level of anonymity due to retaliation [by the company],” Herrera said. “To this day, three workers have been retaliated against for concerted activity and many claim to have been questioned about affiliation with the union.”
While the Rice Management Company has stated that they would only pursue action if substantiated legal claims are made, Herrera said the IUPAT believes legality should not be the only concern for the Rice Management Company as a developer.
“Issues are not often legal and we feel that concerns, whether legal or not, should be addressed,” Herrera said. “While some of these [concerns] are not legal they should be addressed by the company and [Rice Management Company]. Otherwise, we could have contractors that pay minimum wage and are disrespectful to their employees if the only means for action [was that] workers made complaints on [a] legal basis.”
More from The Rice Thresher
Two recommendations, including introducing themes into distribution courses and removing prerequisites from distribution offerings, have been proposed to alter the undergraduate curriculum requirements by the General Education Faculty Working Group, according to Douglas Schuler, associate professor of business and public policy. Schuler presented these working group recommendations at the Sept. 20 Student Association Senate, after presenting them at the Sept. 1 Faculty Senate meeting.
The majority of classes with 50 or more students will transition back to in-person learning between Sept. 20 and Sept. 27, following an email from the Office of the Provost announcing this return. Previously, courses with 50 or more students were kept online, even as other classes returned to in-person learning after the second week of the semester, according to an email from the Office of the Provost on Sept. 2.
Rice University student leaders and faculty are currently working to develop a required course on diversity and inclusion for freshmen, according to Alexander Byrd, the vice provost for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Byrd said that in the past, Rice was not sufficiently diverse to adequately reflect on and begin addressing social problems that the university faces.