Click here for updates on the evolving COVID-19 situation at Rice
Rice University’s Student Newspaper — Since 1916

Thursday, May 13, 2021 — Houston, TX 66°

Rice Management Company discusses contentious CBA at SA meeting

unnamed-courtesy-mary-claire-neal
Courtesy Mary Claire Neal

By Hajera Naveed and Prayag Gordy     3/2/21 10:48pm

Rice Management Company attended last week’s Student Association meeting, updating the Rice community and sparking debate about Rice Management Company’s ongoing development in Houston’s Third Ward. The Ion, a centerpiece of the 16-acre Innovation District, is slated to open later this year, according to Rice Management Company’s manager of strategic initiatives Samuel Dike.

During the meeting, Dike spoke about the drafting of a Community Benefits Agreement, which Rice Management Company plans to sign with the City of Houston. A CBA is a legally binding agreement that calls for specific benefits to be produced by the development project for the community, and serves as a way to enforce developer’s promises. 

“Ultimately, a Community Benefits Agreement is a document that reflects a series of commitments that a developer will make as a part of a project,” Dike said. “Where we differ here in our approach related to the Community Benefits Agreement is that we are planning on signing a Community Benefits Agreement with the City of Houston. There are folks that disagree with that; they would like us to directly do a Community Benefits Agreement with a coalition.”



This CBA has become a point of contention between Rice Management Company and activist coalitions from the historically-Black Third Ward, namely the Houston Coalition for Equitable Development without Displacement. HCEDD’s short-term goal is to address the needs of Third Ward residents who are vulnerable to displacement.

Mary Claire Neal, an organizer with HCEDD, claims that “by definition” a CBA must be between a developer and community organizations, not between a developer and local government.

“[Rice Management Company is] going about a process that has no resemblance to a CBA process across the country, but [is] then calling it a CBA,” Neal, a Jones College senior, said.

Malaika Bergner, the chair of the Student Association’s Ion task force, explained that a CBA should directly include the community in question.

“A CBA needs to be agreed upon by the community that is being affected, but Rice Management Company wants to make a ‘CBA’ with the City of Houston — who should not and cannot speak for Third Ward,” Bergner, a Martel College sophomore, said. “This is an insult to the community that will be most impacted by the Ion and an insult to all of the work that HCEDD has done to educate the public on the meaning of a CBA.”

This conflict echoed an SA meeting from January 2020, when two representatives from Rice Management Company argued against a Senate resolution calling for a CBA with HCEDD. The resolution was later amended to state that the SA would support a CBA with the City of Houston if Rice Management Company made HCEDD an equal decision-maker and signatory in the process; it passed the Senate nearly unanimously on Feb. 17, 2020. HCEDD is not currently involved in the CBA process.

CBA working group

In last week’s Senate discussion, Dike explained that Rice Management Company’s CBA working group would serve as a vessel of community engagement for the development. Dike declined to make recordings of working group meetings available to the Thresher, indicating that a report would be available at the conclusion of the working group process.

“We invited a number of stakeholders to participate in [a] working group last November, and we have had several meetings,” Dike said. “We’re looking to identify specific commitments that would fit into the areas of focus that I mentioned earlier around economic opportunities, housing affordability, and inclusive hiring and contracting.”

Rice Management Company sent a letter on Nov. 17 to HCEDD inviting four representatives to participate in the CBA working group. In a response letter one week later, HCEDD listed six conditions for their participation in the working group, including a commitment from Rice Management Company to enter an “exclusive agreement” with HCEDD.

Rice Management Company did not agree to these terms in a response letter dated Dec. 1, stating that HCEDD had not shared specific proposals and reiterating Rice Management Company’s commitment to an agreement with the City of Houston.

Over two months later, HCEDD reached out to the Rice Management Company to accept four seats on the working group. Rice Management Company suggested that HCEDD and Rice Management Company instead meet separately, though Dike told the Thresher that Rice Management Company’s invitation to HCEDD still stands.

“It wasn’t until recently, after the working group has been meeting for several months now — almost three months — that [HCEDD] were interested in actually now participating in the working group,” Dike said. “Integrating new representatives into the working group requires some sort of orientation.”

Uyiosa Elegon, an organizer for HCEDD, said this correspondence undermined Rice Management Company’s community engagement efforts.

“It seems that Rice Management Company always had an idea of what they thought innovation looks like for community members,” Elegon said. “There are Community Benefits Agreements that have taken years. For them to state that they’re already done with the majority of the process, that they don’t need us, is absolutely horrendous to even hear. Any person, any organization across America that’s gone about community benefits agreements would say this is a sham of a process.”

SA President Anna Margaret Clyburn said she was not originally aware of the recent communications between Rice Management Company and HCEDD when inviting Dike to speak at the SA meeting. 

“Our intention for the conversation was to create an accountability check for the Rice Management Company by giving students the opportunity to ask questions about the development and to meet the new person, [Samuel Dike], who would be charged with working with us on this initiative,” Clyburn said. “We later learned that communication had broken down between the Rice Management Company and community advocates over the year; this is information that could have changed the nature of the invitation had we known this sooner.”

Clyburn said that at the next SA meeting, discussion surrounding this topic will focus on ways the SA can empower students who are engaged in Ion-related activities. 

Updates on the Ion

Retail establishments have started leasing space in the Ion, according to Dike.

“We announced three restaurants that are coming to the district,” Dike said. “Particularly, we’re excited that out of the first three restaurants that we’re announcing, two of them are African American owned and operated.”

Dike anticipates that the Ion building itself will be completed shortly, at which point tenants will begin constructing their spaces. Soon after, events may start happening at the Ion.

“The building would be completed by the first quarter of this year,” Dike said. “After that, our tenant partners will be building out their spaces, and that will take a series of months for them to complete their spaces. Once they do complete their spaces, I think it will be timely that they will occupy those spaces and we may even see some programming depending on how things are going with COVID.”

Elegon said that the completion of the Ion will not affect HCEDD’s organizing related to the entire Innovation District.

“The Ion is [one] of many different buildings,” he said. “One building going up does not detract from this mission and making sure that all the buildings are going to be equitably built, done, strategized and designed.”

Students advocate for HCEDD

In a recent email to Rice Left obtained by the Thresher, Neal called for volunteers to join HCEDD in actions intended to “control the narrative around the Innovation District and secure a Community Benefits Agreement for Third Ward.”

A table in the email lists five “strategy teams”: public comment, grassroots, media, direct action and digital. Actions include door knocking, literature drops, posters, op/eds, car rallies, press conferences and social media ads. Elegon declined to provide many details about these actions, calling them “a conversation on the back end.”

HCEDD is planning these actions to further educate the community about the Innovation District development process, according to Elegon.

“All the actions are being done with the goal of making sure that every person affected by this development, whether it be the resident across the street from the Innovation District, the business owner across the street from the Innovation District, any possible tech entrepreneur that’s going to be in the area, any elected official that has to make any decision on this … understands what the actual true narrative events have been,” Elegon said. “It’s really just all actions that are based off of story sharing.”

The SA Ion task force has also been working closely with HCEDD, and has recently begun planning an opportunity for Rice students to work more closely with HCEDD to build a stronger relationship with the coalition, according to Bergner. The task force is also working to get more transparency from Rice Management Company about their recent development plans, according to Bergner.

“I would like to make something clear — Rice students are in this fight. Our students have been a part of HCEDD since its inception and are completely invested in it to this day,” Bergner said. “We can and we must support our neighbors in the Third Ward as they fight for a CBA that benefits their community. Not only is it the right thing to do, but it is a small piece of what our institution owes to the incredibly rich and vibrant community that existed long before Rice University.”



More from The Rice Thresher

NEWS 5/12/21 12:04pm
Students discuss STRIVE and the Whisper Network at Rice

Following an opinion piece by former Students Turning Rice Into a Violence-Free Environment liaison Sarah Park which called for organizational reform, the Thresher reached out to several STRIVE affiliates to further investigate the claims made and discuss STRIVE’s mission and the whisper network.


Comments

Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.