COVID outbreak could have been mitigated with proactive testing
On Dec. 26 of last year, President David Leebron and future president Reginald DesRoches sent an email to the Rice community regarding plans for this spring semester. The email proclaimed that Rice had “entered a new and different phase of the pandemic.” Specifically, the email stated that the university would “begin to shift our policies to a posture that recognizes COVID-19 as endemic and facilitates our ability to deliver the best education and opportunity to our students, while still taking reasonable precautions.”
While we understand that the cancellation of public parties scheduled for the rest of the semester was deemed necessary due to the rapid increase in COVID-19 cases on campus in the last 10 days, we find that decision is not reflective of the endemic outlook professed in the Dec. 26 email, nor is it consistent with the thorough communication that we have seen from administration up to this point.
The call for “reasonable precautions” in the Dec. 26 email has not been heeded. The campuswide testing requirement was eliminated on Feb. 10, and at no point before Beer Bike were students or alumni asked to take a rapid test to confirm they weren’t contagious. Eliminating social activities for multiple weeks after a sudden rise in cases is the definition of reactive, not proactive.
The way we see it, the removal of a testing regimen was inevitably going to lead to a rise in cases on campus — though it should be noted, no such rise occurred until after hundreds of alumni descended on campus during Beer Bike Week. Antigen testing should be required ahead of large events, in the interest of preventing the sudden and uncontrolled spread we saw begin last week. And if a spike in cases does occur, provided there is no evidence of severe illness, those who test negative should be allowed to attend events and those who test positive should isolate, in the same way that someone who has the flu or a cold shouldn’t attend a public party in the first place.
Implicit in the Dec. 26 email is the notion that COVID-19 is not going anywhere and there will continue to be waves of cases on campus. Canceling social activities for the final two weeks of the semester in response to an entirely predictable and preventable spike in cases after Beer Bike does not reflect the endemic policies outlined in that email. We should be proactive in preventing these waves by requiring negative antigen test results before large gatherings, otherwise we’ll enter a continuous cycle of haphazard policy implementations every time a big event causes a spike in cases.
Editor’s Note: Thresher editorials are collectively written by the members of the Thresher’s editorial board. Current members include Savannah Kuchar, Ben Baker-Katz, Nayeli Shad, Talha Arif, Morgan Gage, Daniel Schrager and Brandon Chen.
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.