The crisis is not over
On May 24 of this year, Chair of the Crisis Management Advisory Committee Kevin Kirby sent an email to the Rice community, informing everyone that the Crisis Management Team would “cease its formal COVID-19 organization and operations” by the end of that week. This came exactly one week after the Crisis Management Team had lifted the indoor mask mandate for vaccinated individuals, essentially returning campus activity to normal. Almost two months prior, President David Leebron had penned a letter signaling the administration's intent to proceed with a relatively normal fall semester. All in all, it was clear that Kirby’s email regarding the cease of CMT operations was the culmination of a year-long effort to return a sense of normalcy to campus.
The summer proceeded without a hitch, with COVID-related indoor-gathering restrictions being removed on June 21. But on Aug. 3, Kirby sent another email, which stated that, due to the surging Delta variant, further restrictions — like indoor masking except for when actively eating or drinking — would be put in place. The August 3 email also announced the reactivation of the CMT.
Following an apparent surge in cases during Orientation Week, the administration implemented some temporary changes: as of Aug. 19, the start of classes were pushed back two days and the first two weeks of instruction were now virtual.
Throughout last year, the Rice community prided itself on staying ahead of COVID, and never letting the virus gain any sort of foothold on campus. But from Aug. 3 onwards, the administration has been reactive instead of proactive. They responded late to the Delta surge, not providing proper time to set up the necessary testing infrastructure to test everyone upon arrival to campus. There was also a shortage of isolation housing due to the volume of students returning to campus this fall. Because of this, they were then forced to respond to what appeared to be an influx of positive cases in the midst of O-Week and quickly reinstate many restrictions.
It was the decision to fully disband CMT and reduce testing capacity that created the reactive situation we found ourselves in throughout the month of August. Without the infrastructure to identify and isolate positive cases, which could have been anticipated due to the prevalence and higher transmissibility of the Delta variant, Rice took many steps back to retroactively hinder the spread of the virus.
To be fair, implementing two weeks of remote instruction, while reactionary to what turned out to be false positives, does provide time to get everyone tested and allow CMT to determine what restrictions are needed moving forward. Assuming everything goes according to plan, and cases in the Houston area decline as expected, we may see a return to semi-normalcy in the next month or two.
But what both Delta and the false-positives debacle proved is that things rarely go according to plan. Even if the situation is better a month from now, and the university is able to roll back most restrictions, we ask that administration not make a premature decision to disband the infrastructure that allows us to contain and combat the spread of COVID-19 on campus. As long as the rest of the world is still battling the pandemic, we cannot fully let our guard down. Otherwise, each August will see as chaotic a return to campus as we witnessed last week.
Editor’s Note: Thresher editorials are collectively written by the members of the Thresher’s editorial board. Current members include Savannah Kuchar, Ben Baker-Katz, Ivanka Perez, Nayeli Shad, Talha Arif, Morgan Gage and Daniel Schrager.
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.