Rice Ph.D graduate known as ‘CRISPR Baby’ scientist sentenced to three years in prison
A Chinese court sentenced He Jiankui (Ph.D. ‘10), who revealed that he had genetically-edited twin girls last year, to three years in prison on Dec. 30, 2019. The questions surrounding his PhD advisor, Rice University bioengineering professor Michael Deem’s involvement in the He’s experiments, remain unanswered. In November 2018, Rice began a full investigation into Deem’s role in the research.
According to the New York Times, He plead guilty to forging documentation from ethics committees approving the study, which he used to recruit participants. Additionally, Chinese media outlets revealed his work on a previously undisclosed third child.
Since Rice’s Nov. 2018 statement, no more public updates on the internal investigation of Deem have been given. The Office of Public Affairs declined to comment for this article.
In the original statement, Rice stated they had been unaware of the project.
“This work as described in press reports violates scientific conduct guidelines and is inconsistent with ethical norms of the scientific community and Rice University,” the statement read.
Meanwhile, Stanford University’s investigation cleared three researchers associated with He in Spring 2019 after concluding they did not encourage or directly participate in the project, according to the New York Times coverage.
Dr. Christopher Scott, professor of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine, studies ethical, legal, social and policy implications of biotechnologies similar to the ones He used. Scott formerly taught a required research ethics course to NIH grant recipients, and also mentioned that he discussed He’s project with an ethics class at Rice last fall.
“The thing that is troubling about the China case is that it’s not a China ethics problem, it is an international problem,” Scott said. “So, the question from an ethics point of view is what are the professional and ethical obligations of those folks, who have either direct knowledge of intent or knowledge that the experiment was conducted, to report this fellow?”
A Chinese scientist associated with the project claimed Deem was “more than just a bystander”, according to an article posted on STAT news in Jan. 2019. The study’s manuscript lists Deem as an author. After He announced his work at a conference in Hong Kong in Nov. 2018, Deem told the Associated Press he had met the twins’ parents. According to the Houston Chronicle, however, he attempted to remove his name from the paper after it was sent to journals such as Nature. The study was ultimately rejected and never published. Deem had served as He’s advisor when he completed his PhD at Rice between 2007 and 2010.
Deem did not respond to requests for comment at the time of publication. Two other bioengineering faculty members also declined to comment.
According to Scott, another issue arises with the language of the consent paperwork which described the gene-therapy experiment as a “vaccination” against H.I.V. The Thresher was not able to obtain a copy of the consent paperwork referenced by Scott.
When it comes to genetic editing, Scott said the “unknowns and risks” of these experiments differ from administering a new drug to a patient or implanting a heart device.
“These are genetic effects that are felt, carried for life, and also carried in heritable ways to generations,” Scott said, “There has to be a commitment to understanding these sorts of things, how you follow these genetically-edited kids through adulthood, and later their children, and their children’s children — a lot of unknowns.”
Dr. Elizabeth Brake, a professor of Philosophy at Rice, taught “Topics in Medical Ethics” in Fall 2019. She is the Editor for the Journal of Applied Philosophy, and she also serves on the Editorial Board of Ethics.
“Given that the technology exists, it’s not surprising that someone has gone ahead and used it,” Brake said, “I think there’s a lot of concern in the fact that we need regulations in advance of people using this technology.”
Two other Chinese scientists connected to He’s work were also given prison sentences, according to coverage by the New York Times. If the project had resulted in a participant’s death, He’s sentence might have exceeded 10 years, according to the Times.
“I think there’s more and more awareness within the scientific community of the need for researchers to consider the possible consequences of their actions and the possible intended consequences,” Brake said, “I think ethics education is helpful for that, in getting people to think not just about the various considerations, but also thinking creatively about the unintended consequences of their actions.”
Scott said that despite the “uncomfortable and unfortunate” nature of He’s experiments and their aftermath, he believes they constitute a teaching moment.
“Even though this was an uncomfortable and unfortunate event, it's really one of those teaching moments,” Scott said “You have to ask the question institutionally, what can be done to up the level of ethical foresight in teaching universities and research universities? That's a hard question to answer.”
[1/15/2020 1:39 p.m.] This article has been corrected to reflect the fact that Scott is not the head of medical ethics at Baylor.
[1/17/2020 7:10 p.m.] This article has been updated with quotes and information from Dr. Elizabeth Brake.
More from The Rice Thresher
The upcoming Faculty Senate vote on the pass/fail policy changes, which were proposed in March, has been postponed due to disagreements among faculty about the changes, according to Faculty Senate Speaker Christopher Johns-Krull.
When students call Student Health Services with symptoms that overlap with the broad symptoms of COVID-19, they may be placed on medical hold. Although the purpose of a medical hold is to contain a potential infection, students have shared concerns regarding communication.
In light of the pandemic, campus organizations are trying to balance providing open access to sexual health resources while simultaneously not encouraging unsafe COVID practices. While some students have stated they are choosing to change their sexual behavior to accommodate safety regulations, others voiced their choice to remain sexually active.