Editorial: Rice should set specific goals for international student aid
Last week, Rice unveiled a new financial aid program it’s calling the Rice Investment. The program, lauded by this board in last week’s editorial, will expand Rice’s tuition and fee grants dramatically. But the Rice Investment doesn’t offer the same help to international students, who make up 13 percent of this year’s incoming undergraduate class (see p. 1). To address this, the administration should set measurable and actionable goals for providing financial aid to international students.
While Vice President for Enrollment Yvonne Romero da Silva stated Rice will undertake fundraising efforts to support international students as part of its next capital campaign, we would like to see a more clearly defined and transparent goal for the amount Rice hopes to raise. Just as the defined income brackets and $150 million fundraising effort for the Rice Investment will encourage a more socioeconomically diverse applicant pool, a clear commitment to increasing financial aid for international students as opposed to a vague promise would increase the diversity of Rice’s international student body — a goal outlined in Rice’s Vision for the Second Century, Second Decade.
There are also smaller and more immediate steps Rice can take to ease the burden on international students. One way Rice can take immediate action is allowing international students who did not initially apply for aid to apply in future years if there is a change in their family’s ability to afford a Rice education. The upcoming meeting between President David Leebron, Dean of Undergraduates Bridget Gorman, da Silva and international student representatives should result in actionable steps that can be implemented in a timely manner.
The Thresher editorial board also questions the reasons provided for excluding international students from the plan. Da Silva claimed that it would be inappropriate to use the same thresholds abroad as in the United States. However, Rice could consider the average cost of living and household income, along with other factors, in other countries. Da Silva also compared Rice’s current policies to those of other top institutions like Brown, Stanford and Columbia. But Rice should aim higher. Harvard, Yale and Princeton all fully meet demonstrated financial need for international students.
Finally, we domestic students can do more to support international students. By seeking to understand the experience of international students and voicing our concerns to the administration, we can work to ensure a significant portion of the student body isn’t left out of the conversation.
More from The Rice Thresher
‘Screwball antics’: Tracing the history of Beer Bike
Last week, the Thresher released a letter from the editor’s desk lamenting strict Beer Bike safety precautions that have started to chip away at the event’s tradition. The Thresher spoke to alumni and dug into the archives to explore the inception of Beer Bike and its storied history.
Rice hits record low 7.7% acceptance rate for ‘27
Rice’s Office of Admissions admitted 2,399 students out of a total 31,049 applicants, on March 27. With a 7.7% admit rate, this year has seen a new record-low for acceptances, surpassing last year’s previous record-low of 8.56% for the Class of 2026.
Undergrad tuition to increase 5.7% next academic year
Rice’s undergraduate tuition for the 2023-24 academic year will be $57,210, a 5.7% increase from the previous year. This brings the total cost of attendance up to $74,028, marking the fourth consecutive year of tuition increases and highest percentage increase in recent years. The most recent comparable tuition hike was an increase of 5.4% for the 2010-11 academic year, which came in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.