SA IVP race puts nonpartisanship on trial
Juliette Turner is currently running for SA internal vice president. She is also the Rice University College Republicans chairperson. At the recent IVP debate, when asked if these two roles would conflict, Turner responded, “It wouldn’t conflict. That’s all I have to say if you want to go to the next question.”
The IVP oversees and advises committees working on various initiatives, many of which with explicitly political objectives. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, reproductive resources and campus sustainability initiatives will all be on the docket. Maintaining her public role as the College Republicans chairperson undeniably creates a conflict with the projects she would be overseeing in the SA.
Past figures such as former SA President Griffin Thomas, who was vice president of the Rice Young Democrats, and incoming SA External Vice President Maurice Frediere, who is the current Rice Young Democrats co-president, have abdicated their political positions in favor of their nonpartisan service to the Rice community at large. This precedent deters conflict of interest and keeps the SA representative of all students regardless of political ideology, allowing leadership to clearly and openly confront issues without political bias.
Turner can still have a voice without being the College Republicans figurehead. Turner said in the debate, “This race is not about me, it’s about you.” As much as that sounds nice in every campaign it’s been said, these races are about the candidates too. And those candidates should rise to the occasion.
Brown College Sophomore
Rice Young Democrats Treasurer
Sid Richardson College Senior
Rice Young Democrats co-President
Note: Maurice Frediere responded to this op-ed in a letter to the editor.
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.