Vote yes on U-court amendment to ensure a sound judicial system
The SA election does not simply concern elected positions; there is also an important amendment that Rice students can vote on. One of these concerns the University Court requirements for office. As the rules currently stand, a U-Court judge can also sit on a college court. This inherently creates conflict of interests if U-Court heard a case from college court on its appellate jurisdiction, especially if the student
holds a position of leadership on one of the two levels. It would be comparable to a United States Supreme Court judge sitting on a state's bench, something that would be completely unthinkable. This amendment alleviates these sorts of conflicts of interests. Rice is privileged to have a student-run court system but we must acknowledge
that undergraduates are also capable of the same biases as anyone
else. The Thresher heartily endorses this amendment to make our judicial system more fair.
More from The Rice Thresher
Rice University philosophy professor Tim Schroeder on textbook piracy
The question of the week asks, “Is it ethical to pirate textbooks for my college courses?”
Recent H&D decisions are eroding trust between students and administration
What you read below was intended to be presented at the Housing and Dining Town Hall on September 1, 2 to 4 p.m. Instead of presenting this, students patiently waited in the heavy downpour, expecting their voices to be heard, but a formal cancellation of the Town Hall was not issued until about half an hour afterward via Instagram.
Make Rice a tailgating school again
What seems to be the last Bayou Bucket Classic is in three days. Will students show up for the crosstown rivalry?
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.