Facebook wields immense power today
I remember it clearly and vividly, as if it were but a week ago. I was lackadaisically reading class work when naturally I decided to visit Facebook. As soon as my homepage opened I knew something was wrong. The layout I had come to know and appreciate for months had changed yet again. On the left side, I had lists where I could now organize my friend into separate fields and rank like a high school lunchroom in a teen comedy. Above my chat sidebar, itself a new additon this summer, I had a constant newsfeed so I could see what all my internet acquaintances were doing at this very moment. My entire social network would never be the same.
These changes aren't the only ones in store. At F8, the recent Facebook conference in San Francisco, CEO Mark Zurkerberg said Facebook would soon start updating profiles to include "Timeline," a feature which will allow customers to plot their entire lives and social network career.
With recurring frequency ours is being referred to as the "Facebook generation." The '60s had hippies and social protest. The '80s had synthesizers and cocaine. We have comments and likes. We spend hours pouring over the inane status updates scrolling down our newsfeeds looking at pictures of our friends' Saturday nights. This strange website has become as central to our collegiate experience as sleeping through breakfast and racing to finish our homework.
If Facebook is so important, then its frequent changes are not of little consequence. However, we fail to really ponder what they mean. At first we complain, but our protests have far more to do with an affinity to the status quo than of any true substance. We post jokes about "Facebookception: Facebook within a Facebook" and then get on with our Internet lives, watching cat videos and liking our friends' latest statuses.
Slowly but surely Facebook is making itself to be more important in our lives, and it is increasingly becoming the lens in which we see the world. Take Timeline, for example. Having our family photos and memories stored on the Facebook servers could be extremely convenient and allow us to share things with those we love. However, putting such things on the Internet means we lose control over them. The idea of Facebook owning our digital identities is disconcerting to say the least, and ripe for abuse. The internet postings of our lives play a large part in defining ourselves, and soon Mr. Zuckerberg will have even more influence in how we perceive our very identity.
Don't be mistaken. Facebook is a powerful tool with tremendous promise. It was one of the many elements that helped make the democratic uprisings in the Arab Spring possible. We just need to be cautious about exactly how much power it begins to wield in our lives.
Anthony Lauriello is a Wiess College junior and Thresher Backpage editor.
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.