Editorial: Rice must commit to undergraduate teaching
Photo credit to Charlene Pan
The Thresher editorial board stands with over 400 students who have signed the petition for Julianne Yost to remain at Rice. While there are statements in the petition that are incorrect – Yost is an instructor, not a lecturer, and due to the limited terms of instructors, her contract cannot be renewed – the chemistry department should hire her as either a lecturer or teaching professor.
The petition, Yost’s stellar student reviews and her receipt of the George R. Brown Award for Superior Teaching, which is voted on by recent alumni, offer overwhelming evidence that Yost’s focus on teaching has improved the learning experience of her students.
One of the main goals of Rice’s Vision for the Second Century, Second Decade (V2C2) is to “provide a transformative undergraduate education.” To achieve this goal, the V2C2 document elaborates that Rice “must continue to implement evidence-based innovations in teaching and learning and support teaching improvement.” To let go of Yost despite resounding evidence that she helps Rice to provide its students with a transformative undergraduate education contradicts this goal.
In the “Why Does My Teacher Suck?” panel last spring, History Professor Lisa Balabanlilar said having tenure-track professors teach courses allows Rice to maintain its status as a top research university. While we understand Rice is a research university, we believe this label should not come at the expense of effective and popular instructors like Yost. In 2018, U.S. News & World Report ranked Rice No. 3 for “Best Undergraduate Teaching.” World-class research certainly attracts some undergraduates, but we believe teaching is a far more valuable aspect of the undergraduate experience.
Every year, students fill in course reviews about their classes and wonder whether their opinions on courses will be taken into account. It can often feel as though issues in the way a course is taught persist despite years of critical feedback. Rehiring Yost as a faculty member in the chemistry department is an opportunity for the university to demonstrate it is listening to student feedback on teaching. The chair of the chemistry department, Anatoly Kolomeisky, said hiring decisions are based on the needs of the department. We at the Thresher believe there is always a need at Rice for dedicated teachers like Yost.
This editorial reflects the consensus opinion of the Rice Thresher editorial board. Any responses to this piece can be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org.
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.