Rice University’s Student Newspaper — Since 1916

Tuesday, August 09, 2022 — Houston, TX

​Low Income Deniability: Rice must stop taking advantage of international students

Rice needs to join peer institutions like Harvard, Yale, Princeton and MIT in offering need-blind admission to international students.

Photo by | The Rice Thresher

By Daniel Koh     3/28/18 12:30am

Every so often, Dean Hutch drops in on Student Association Senator dinners to answer questions and give input on student initiatives. On Feb. 21, much of our discussion was on accessibility. Hutch rattled off a list of occasions in which he had personally taken care of students’ emergency financial needs and gave an inspiring speech about the value of our Rice education. Then I asked him one question that snagged on a thread in the discussion, and the whole idea of accessibility at Rice began to unravel.

I asked Hutch what I could do for my international friend who is struggling with an emergency medical situation back home. In one fell swoop, she had gone from low income to lower income, from two sources of income to one crippled by hospital bills. She had barely scraped together enough money for this semester’s tuition and she cannot afford another. As it stands now, she faces an ultimatum: Get help or get out. In Hutch’s response to my question, the ugly truth was revealed: that Rice would provide no help of any kind. He said he was sorry that Rice’s need-aware policy for international students forced her to misrepresent her financial status, but that she was still bound by what she said in her application despite her clear change in circumstances. I was disappointed and disillusioned by Hutch’s answer, which seemed to completely contradict his earlier reports of meeting emergency financial needs.

Hutch is not the only one at fault, but his response is a symptom of a larger disease that eats away at the idea of accessibility. Financial aid may not be under his direct jurisdiction, but tuition affects all undergrads, and affects them unequally. Rice cannot claim that it “fosters diversity” if 11.5 percent of its students are denied equal opportunity based on citizenship alone. It is hypocritical to denounce oppression and discrimination when our own policies use the rhetoric of the oppressor. Rice needs to join peer institutions like Harvard, Yale, Princeton and MIT in offering need-blind admission to international students. Rice needs to stop looking at the rest of the world through money-colored lenses and start living up to its ideal of accessibility.

The reality for most international students is that regardless of actual income, they cannot admit to needing financial aid on their applications. According to the Rice financial aid website, “For international students, a candidate's ability to fund the cost of attendance is a factor considered in the admission process.” This is a clear statement that Rice prefers international students that come cheap. What a great deal, increasing the number of students who are forced to pay for everything themselves and then using them to brag about diversity, 100 percent free advertising. After I broke the bad news to my friend, she had this to say: “I hum when I get nervous, and I have to stop and stare whenever I see a dog. I’m a real human being with emotions and a family, and I wish Rice saw more than just another international student statistic. I wish they saw me as a person too.”

More from The Rice Thresher

OPINION 5/12/22 4:05pm
The Wellbeing Center should be transparent about its true confidentiality policies

Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.

OPINION 4/19/22 11:11pm
We’re in student media to learn

This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.

OPINION 4/19/22 11:02pm
Philanthropy doesn’t excuse slavery

In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.


Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.