LTTE: Correcting the record on the Thresher's endorsement
First, to the People for Palanki, thank you. Thank you for all the love and support you have shown during this campaign, from hanging flyers to changing profile picture frames to keeping me sane throughout these stressful weeks. It means the world to me.
I wanted to write this letter to address the Thresher’s recent endorsement. I am not upset that I did not receive their endorsement, as Ariana is a terrific candidate. Further, I completely respect the Editorial Board’s opinion, as they, like all students, are entitled to their own thoughts and views. However, I do believe that my leadership and my platform were mischaracterized by the Thresher’s editorial. My hope with this letter is that the student body can draw their own conclusions based on all the facts and determine the best candidate.
“[Rohan] does not display the same realism and vision for carrying [specific ideas] out.”
My vision is clear: improvements for all Rice students, not just one particular demographic. To carry out this vision, I have constructed a platform consisting of projects in several areas of student interest, from academics to student life and from wellbeing to diversity. I have a concrete plan for each point on my platform, featuring communication with students and administration, collaboration with members of the SA, and execution through careful planning and accountability. My proposals aren’t just ideas; they are projects that I know how to execute, because of my experiences in the SA and my connections within the administration. I understand that it may be difficult to accomplish all of my goals, but my sense of realism will help me prioritize and complete projects based on student input.
“His platform seems more like a grab bag of various small projects around, like … turning off lights to save electricity.”
Yes, I have several small projects within my platform, but this does not mean they will not be impactful. Rather, these projects will demonstrate that small improvements at Rice can be combined to cause tremendous benefit for the entire student body. Perhaps turning off the lights in common spaces to save electricity is not the most grandiose of ideas, but it could be the first step toward a more sustainable Rice.
“Palanki has not displayed the same careful consideration and reflection as Engles has in her proposals.”
As I mentioned above, the source of my diverse set of ideas is the student body. For the past three years, I have observed and listened to student input. The conversations are repetitive: How do I get more involved in the SA? Why do I have to pay for breakfast? Whom do I go to for graduate school advice? While I have acted on some of these ideas, there is so much more to be done. After careful consideration and reflection, I crafted my platform to bring these concerns to light and produce tangible solutions to long-standing needs. The specificity of my platform ensures that action is actually accomplished.
“His suggestion for a greater variety in meal plans did not demonstrate the same level of consideration for either student opinion or financial feasibility.”
I strongly disagree with this statement. Student opinion clearly indicates a desire for increased flexibility in meal plan options. In fact, this was the very basis for the SA’s implementation of Saturday dinner in the serveries, as students desired an on-campus dining option. However, conversations around meal plan options have not subsided. I have observed that students wish to have greater control over the number of purchased meal swipes per semester in order to avoid paying for meals that are not consumed. Although this may seem financially unfeasible for H&D, this department always considers student needs first, evidenced by the addition of Saturday dinners at no additional cost to students, and many of our peer institutions boast this flexibility already. As a result, I am confident that the SA and H&D can collaborate to address student meal plan concerns.
“His lack of thoughtfulness in his proposals … would make his election as SA President worrisome.”
It is unjustified to state that my proposals lack thought, as they are grounded in student opinion and are accompanied by specific plans of action through collaboration with the administration. I am confident in my platform and my ability to achieve its goals. As noted by the Thresher, I am the candidate with the most experience within the SA, meaning that not only do I know what needs to be done, but also how to do it. I am not a worrisome candidate at all, but a capable leader with a clear vision, tangible goals and a passion to improve Rice for all students.
SA Presidential Candidate
Jones College junior
More from The Rice Thresher
How should we discuss food, then? I don’t want to be misunderstood as advising against all food-related conversations. I feel quite the opposite: eating is one of humanity’s oldest social rituals. It’s meant to bring us together. We’re at our best when we engage in conversations that center the enjoyment of food rather than its nutritional content.
The first wave of COVID-19 erupted in the U.S. in early 2020. Rice responded quickly: During March 9-15, classes for the week preceding Spring Break were canceled, students were instructed not to return to campus after Spring Break, and instruction after Spring Break was made fully remote. This quick reaction to the pandemic was typical of many organizations and localities all around the country, as it became clear that social distancing was then the only effective way to slow down the spread of the disease. This seems to have worked and, by early May, the first wave was somewhat subsiding. The Rice administration then tasked the Academic Restart Committee with the mission of “Return to Rice.”
To be sure, a poetic analogy between music and our differences will not resolve any issues directly. It can, however, remind us of our shared humanity. It can get us back in touch with our nature as social animals. It is a nature that is often oppressed by the individualism in our capitalistic society that encourages competition, putting too much focus on the dissonances for our own good.