Letter to the Editor: Distribution requirements should be reduced to nothing
To the Editor:
As the faculty
I have yet to genuinely invest in a distribution class. Instead, these courses are annoying hoops I jump through on the way to a worthier goal. I attend class based on the recommendation of a Magic 8 Ball I keep on my desk – ostensibly earning only 12 out of the 24 required credits measured in terms of attendance. I don’t take my assignments for these classes seriously because of the pass/fail
Few of my distribution courses have enriched my education, and many of them have unfairly burdened professors with disinterested students. Conversely, in courses outside my major (many of which should grant distribution credit yet do not), I have poured my heart and soul into essays, dug into material outside of class, and repeatedly visited with professors during office hours, developing valuable relationships and intellectual vibrancy.
I understand that allowing students to set their own curriculum requirements is anathema to many professors. However, I posit that we already do exactly this, regardless of graduation requirements, simply by modulating the time and energy we invest into our courses.
I fully encourage graduation requirements that require exploration. But if you limit my selection to a narrow range of topics I find uninteresting (from my conversations with peers I am far from alone in this opinion), please do not make the mistake of equating course completion with achieving a broad and meaningful education.
Alex Hayes, Baker College ’18
More from The Rice Thresher
You should apply to join Chao College
For many of you, your residential college is the heart of your Rice experience. You’ve cheered for it, led within it and maybe even helped shape its traditions. It’s where you experienced Orientation Week, shared countless meals, stayed up too late in deep conversations and formed lifelong friendships.
Ask a Rice Philosopher: Why is it so easy for me to dislike members of the Honor Council?
The question of the week asks, “Why is it so easy for me to dislike members of the Honor Council simply for being on the Honor Council, when realistically, I know that cheating is bad and there should be consequences for it?”
Anonymous posting gives voice to campus hate
People at Rice used to have opinions. They used to write op-eds with charming titles, like “Dry your eyes, young men: Baldness is in” and letters to the editor accusing the Backpage of everything from libel to not including enough personal attacks (both in the same week, no less).
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.