Housing and Dining cup policy must necessarily adjust to student laziness
Rice University students have reached a new level of laziness. This semester, Baker College Kitchen and West Servery have already replaced all 3,200 of their cups. Additionally, last year the serveries collectively purchased, lost and replaced 8,000 cups. To combat the problem, Housing and Dining has suggested adding 16-ounce disposable cups to the servery. and Tierra Moore, SA Environmental Committee co-chair, has proposed H&D not replace the cups to discourage students from stealing them (see p.1).
However, neither of the proposed solutions address the actual problem — that students are too lazy to return cups to the serveries. Instead of attempting to change student behavior, H&D must meet their laziness head on.
Paper cups merely create more waste, and forcing H&D to not replenish the cup supply creates the potential problem of severely under-serving student needs. Thus, neither option is sustainable in the long-run.
To remedy the cup situation, returning cups should be incentivized and stealing or otherwise displacing cups should be disincentivized. H&D should create more entry-points for cup return. Every floor of every college should have a cup return container that is sanitary, covered and frequently checked for new cups. Each college would have a Cup Representative who ensures the containers are sanitary and returns them to the servery at the end of each day or when they are full.
If students cannot walk 10 feet to the cup return containers, then they will be fined. A fine of $50 per incidence of cup negligence should be enough to both discourage stealing and appropriately punish those who do steal. The fine must be enforced to be effective.
To be clear, when students are lazy about returning cups to the servery, they are also irresponsible. However, other forms of cup thievery, such as throwing cups in the trash, are even more negligent and irresponsible. Throwing away cups not only contributes to the cup shortage, but also ensures that the cup will be irretrievable and instead contribute to pollution while it decays in a landfill.
While the Thresher wishes it did not have to suggest a policy that so directly caters to the student population’s irresponsibility, students have done little to inspire confidence in their ability to do something as simple as periodically return their accumulated cups to the servery. Ideally, the solution would be as easy as telling students to return their cups as soon as possible, but students have shown that their laziness supersedes any considerations of sustainability or spending.
Unsigned editorials represent the majority opinion of the Thresher editorial staff. All other opinion pieces represent solely the opinion of the piece’s author.
More from The Rice Thresher
Two years ago, a group of Thresher staffers went to Washington D.C. to attend the College Media Association’s annual convention, during which student journalists shared concerns that their communities didn’t take them seriously. Administrators would patronize them and ignore emails, and coverage often went unread.
For those of you who are seniors, you’ll remember a campus controversy that broke out in April 2019 when The Hoot announced its decision to stop serving Chick-fil-A amid criticism of its donations to three organizations — the Salvation Army, the Paul Anderson Youth Home and the Fellowship of Christian Athletes — that have taken anti-LGBTQ+ stances. When the policy took effect the following fall, I spoke out against the decision in this paper, arguing the secondary boycott was nothing more than token enforcement of an unworkable standard. I still believe that we shouldn’t take into account political considerations when we eat. But The Hoot didn’t budge, and the controversy quickly faded away. I have close friends on both sides of the issue, so I didn’t push the matter any further.
We’re nearing the end of another semester in the COVID-19 pandemic, filled with policy changes requiring flexibility from administration, faculty and students alike. We appreciate the administration’s responsiveness to the evolving pandemic, but the continuous changes are not without consequences. This semester has been hard on many students’ mental health due to insufficient academic accommodations on top of pandemic-related stress. While we understand the necessity in being flexible with COVID policies due to the ever-changing nature of the pandemic, administration and professors should recognize the impact this has on students and their mental health, and be proactive in accounting for this.