Rice University's student judicial system a distinct network set up to ensures fairness
In all the discussions that have occurred since the hard liquor probation was enacted, it is easy to lose sight of one of the characteristics that makes Rice University unique: student governance. Students created the Honor Code and inspired large parts of the Student Code of Conduct and Alcohol Policy. The hard liquor probation itself was, in fact, informed and implemented by student leaders across campus. Our tradition of a student-led judicial system means that students, not university officials, hold fellow students to Rice community standards.
Three separate student-led organizations make up the judicial system at Rice. College courts, University Court, and Honor Council serve as the foundation of the judicial system which protects the community culture we all value. These three institutions generally function independently of one another, with college courts handling college-specific matters (such as damaging college property), U. Court handling violations of the Code of Conduct and Alcohol Policy (such as underage drinking and hazing) and Honor Council handling violations of the Honor Code (such as cheating and plagiarism). These institutions play an ever important part in our campus culture in a way that separates Rice from other institutions.
Rice's judicial programs are for students, by students. In the context of the Rice community, this has outstanding significance. Student-based judicial programs ensure that the discipline of any student is reflective of the culture of the Rice community. That is, decisions in cases are based off existing cultural norms and expectations. Honor Council and U. Court conduct investigations, hearings and deliberations to form disciplinary recommendations to the Associate Dean of Student Judicial Programs. That Honor Council and U. Court recommendations hold such weight with the university demonstrates just how important student expectations of behavior are in judicial matters.
Having student-based judicial programs also means that Honor Council and U. Court are as fair as possible to accused students, providing high levels of transparency and thoroughness. U. Court and Honor Council both provide accused students with ombudsmen to support and guide them throughout judicial processes. If an RUPD officer refers a student to U. Court, any member of U. Court can concisely explain what to expect from the judicial process. The same is true of Honor Council for students accused of violating the Honor Code. Rice's judicial institutions also ensure that students accused of violations are given a fair investigation. In the case of U. Court, a non-voting member serves as the chief investigator to determine and question witnesses, gather information from RUPD, and question the accused.
Above all, these institutions reinforce the strength of Rice's student community. Because each institution represents a group of peers, accused students should know that they will not be judged unfairly. If a community member allegedly violated the expectations of the community, the community itself determines if a violation occurred, the severity of that violation and appropriate sanctions for the violation. It also means that each student has a role in determining what is acceptable behavior within our campus community – not just reacting to standards set from outside. For these reasons, Rice University is unique in its handling of discipline. It fosters a judicial philosophy that we should all be proud of because we are the ones who shape it.
Nick Cornell is a Sid Richardson freshman and Amber Kunkel is a Hanszen College senior.
More from The Rice Thresher
Students deserve to know more given the substantial adjustments we will have to make in response. We implore the administration to be more transparent about their contingency plans.
Demands, not suggestions: When it comes to anti-racism on campus, the administration must listen to Black students
We believe the contents of Leebron’s email, and the fact that it has been the only statement made by the administration on the subject, show that the administration is not taking these demands seriously enough. We implore the administration to take decisive action and commit to implementing the demands of Rice's Black community.
“Statues are not meant to teach events. They are constructed to honor the memory of those depicted. Like all slave owners, William Marsh Rice is not worth reverence,” write Taylor Crain (Lovett ‘21), Lauren Palladino (Duncan ‘21), Emily Weaver (Jones ‘22) and Divine Webber (Duncan ‘22).