Letters to the Editor
To the Editor:
In an article in last week's Thresher ("Tuition increases for incoming Rice students," Mar. 11), it was noted that tuition for next year's incoming class will increase by 5.4 percent. This is in spite of the fact that, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the C.P.I. for 2010 only increased 1.5 percent. Over the same period, the S&P 500 increased 12.6 percent (Yahoo Finance) excluding dividends. This substantial increase likely reflects the increase in Rice's endowment, which is the largest revenue source for the university. The university estimates that the endowment is around $4 billion.
It's difficult to justify this increase in light of the above even if, as President Leebron says, the university is facing some potential losses of state and federal funding. He also said, "It is important to note that based on both tuition charges and financial aid, Rice remains one of the most affordable private universities and colleges." It won't remain in that group for long if it keeps raising tuition at a rate over three and a half times the rise in prices.
President Leebron noted, "We have maintained our commitment to generous financial aid and a lower tuition price even in the midst of the present economic environment and our endowment losses." What loss? According to the university itself, the value of the endowment increased by $180 million in the last fiscal year (ending June 30th) and it estimates the increase to be $310 million this year.
Tuition increases far beyond the rate of inflation is not only a strain on next year's students but injurious to the future of the university.
Roy Loya (Parent '15)
More from The Rice Thresher
Before you attend a counseling session at the Rice counseling center, you will be told that “the RCC maintains strict standards regarding privacy.” You will find statements from the university that your mental health record will not be shared with anyone outside of extreme situations of imminent harm, and only then that your information will be shared with only the necessary officials. This sounds great, except that these assurances bear no teeth whatsoever — no enforcement agency ensures that Rice follows its public confidentiality promises, and there are no penalties for Rice if they break them. The Wellbeing and Counseling Centers should more directly communicate the limits of their confidentiality policies when compared to unaffiliated counseling centers, and students in sensitive situations should take the necessary precautions to protect their information.
This week marks the last issue of the Thresher for the year, and for the seniors like myself, our last issue ever. I have been a part of the Thresher since freshman year. And it would not be an exaggeration to say it has defined my Rice experience. As someone pursuing a career in journalism after graduation, there has been no better place to learn than at this paper.
In January, the Rice Board of Trustees announced plans to move the Founder’s memorial to another area of the academic quad as part of a whole redesign, adding additional context of his “entanglement” with slavery. This comes despite continual calls from the student body to not have the enslaver displayed in the quad regardless of the context provided. It would be just for these calls to action and the majority of the Task Force Committee who voted to not keep it there that the Board of Trustees decide to not keep the memorial prominently displayed in the quad at all.