Waltz with Bashir: Embracing the Subjectivity of Emotional Experience

Admit it: The choice to use animation seems counterintuitive for a movie that sells itself as a documentary. Wouldn't a more typical, less fantasy-like form be more appropriate for a film that seeks to uncover past events? Wouldn't a normal documentary be more objective, more realistic, and more, well, true?This film challenges this kind of thinking and the notion that truth is specific to a certain kind of filmmaking. Actually, one can argue that it is impossible to be completely objective or "truthful" in any artistic medium.
Our human experience is so complex and our memory so subjective that any attempt to recreate reality is going to be lacking at best. Even in the most "objective" documentaries, one must realize that the camera prioritizes certain perspectives in order to accomplish specific goals. If the director wants to make an event exciting, he may choose to use a handheld camera with a specific lens. This is the director's subjective decision, which may not be the way other people would choose to film the event.
All film is a form of deception; movies trick our minds and our eyes in order to tell a story. The multitude of camera lenses, stunt doubles, green screens, props, sound stages, and special effects are only a few ways that movies seek to effectively deceive its viewers. One practical example is the physical shooting of a movie. During production, a movie is never filmed in the correct sequence of time; doing this would incur unnecessary financial costs and cause many avoidable inconveniences. Yet, in the editing room, these disparate scenes are spliced together to give the appearance of continuity.
On an even simpler level, we know that Christian Bale really isn't a superhero after dark, yet we allow ourselves to be deceived in order to enjoy the story. Waltz with Bashir recognizes the innate subjectivity of film, but instead of faking "reality," it embraces the freedoms of film and animation in order to create a more authentic experience. It is this liberation that allows for an effective expression of very personal and emotional events.
Waltz with Bashir is Ari Folman's attempt to retrace and relive his experience as an Israeli soldier in the Lebanon War of 1982. The film is about remembering past events, and thus, the search is inextricably linked to memories and dreams. In fact, the film opens with nightmare.
Right from the beginning, we find ourselves immersed in a surreal world saturated with deep blues and vivid yellows as we watch rabid dogs terrorize everything in their way. The film cuts to a bar scene where we see Folman sitting with a friend, listening to his war compatriot retell this horrific dream. When asked if he has any of these dreams, Folman realizes that he does not have any recollection of the war.
How can such a traumatic, emotional, and personal experience leave no mark on his life? Folman is deeply troubled by this, and the rest of the film follows him as he finds the people who help him recover his memory.
He meets a variety of people, ranging from soldiers who were once his army mates to psychoanalysts and psychiatrists who offer their analysis. Each of these encounters is visually articulated on the screen, from a soldier's dream of resting on a giant nude woman as she swims in the ocean to a soldier's near-death experience when his tank was ambushed. Each of these encounters adds a unique dimension to Folman's incomplete memory which, when fully restored, reveals a shocking truth about Folman's past.
The beauty of the film comes in the visual renderings of these dreams and memories. The animation is stunning: The colors, music, and pace of the film work perfectly to create the somber, surrealistic nature of these experiences.
Waltz with Bashir doesn't pretend to be "true," something that no movie can ever really be. The strict factualness of the events becomes somewhat irrelevant as the retelling of the emotional experiences is much more fascinating.
Truth is important in the film, but the objective is not to document. Instead, the truth is found in Folman's personal experience, one that fully embraces the subjectivity of all memory and perception. The freedom of the medium allows Folman to effectively communicate the dystopic and surreal nature of his past. This is all art can be: a personal, emotional, and subjective expression. And this is a successful one.
More from The Rice Thresher

Founder’s Court goes alt-rock as bôa kicks off U.S. tour at Rice
Founder’s Court morphed into a festival ground Friday night as British alt-rock band bôa launched the U.S. leg of their “Whiplash” tour. The group headlined the third annual Moody X-Fest before what organizers estimate was “a little bit over 2,000 students” — the largest turnout in the event’s three-year history.
Rice launches alternative funding program amid federal research cuts
Rice is launching the Bridge Funding Program for faculty whose federal funding for research projects has been reduced or removed. The program was announced via the Provost’s newsletter April 24.
This moment may be unprecedented — Rice falling short is not
In many ways, the current landscape of American higher education is unprecedented. Sweeping cuts to federal research funding, overt government efforts to control academic departments and censor campus protests and arbitrary arrests and visa revocations have rightly been criticized as ushering in the latest iteration of fascism.
Please note All comments are eligible for publication by The Rice Thresher.