Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Increased student body raises Student- Teacher ratio at Rice

Published: Friday, October 5, 2012

Updated: Friday, October 5, 2012 05:10


 

Though the administration is trying to increase student enrollment as part of its Vision for the Second Century, the number of faculty has not increased commensurately, according to Dean of Undergraduates John Hutchinson. 

As a result, the student-faculty ratio is 6:1, as compared to 5.2:1 in 2005, Hutchinson said. 

According to Hutchinson, the number of faculty is fixed and does not fluctuate drastically from year to year. 

“In our Vision for the Second Century, we are trying to increase student enrollment from 2,800 to 3,800,” Hutchinson said. “Since we did not hire an influx of professors, our student-teacher ratio will be a bit higher than in the past.”

Rice currently has 3,708 undergraduate and 2,374 graduate degree-seeking students, according to Hutchinson, who received this information from the Office of Institutional Research. This number is projected to increase in the future. 

The student-faculty ratio in 2000 was 7:1, according to U.S. News and World Report. This decreased to 5.2:1 in 2005 and increased again to 5.7:1 in 2010. 

 In addition, U.S. News and World Report states that 69.6 percent of Rice’s classes have fewer than 20 students while 22.5 percent of Rice’s classes have between 20 and 49 students in the class. Only 8 percent of classes have over 50 students. The average class size for all classes at Rice, according to the Office of Institutional Research, is 21 students, while the median is 13. 

Recently, upper-level engineering classes have had relatively high enrollment, according to Hutchinson, who received the information from the Office of Institutional Research. Hutchinson said this increase is due to student body’s shifting interests. 

“The population of students moves around from year to year,” Hutchinson said. “Since we are a small university, the demand for different majors will vary over time. In both the past and future, we will have dramatic increases in all subjects.”

Brown College senior and electrical engineer Isabella Gonzalez said she believes the class sizes for engineering classes are much higher than that of courses in other departments. 

“If I had to guess, the [typical class size] is 15 for electrical engineering students,” Gonzalez said. 

Gonzalez attributes the increase in class size for electrical engineering courses to the increased interest in the major. 

“My classes are really unnaturally large,” Gonzalez said. “In the year above us, there were about 20 electrical engineers. In my year, there are about 45 electrical engineers.”

Sid Richardson senior and economics, classical studies and policy studies major Neeraj Salhotra said class sizes may be different for upper-level humanities courses. 

“I am currently taking three classes where it is just me and the professor,” Salhotra said. “The upper-level courses in these subjects are great for their small faculty interaction.”

Will Rice College sophomore and political science major Devynn Moreno, who was previously an architecture student, said the ratio can differ by distribution. 

“Our architecture [class size] was typically 13,” Moreno said. “Currently, I would predict the average [class size at Rice] to be 20.”

Brown College junior and bioengineering major Melody Tan said bioengineering classes are much larger. 

“For most bioengineering classes, not including general math and science courses that are required for our major, I would estimate that the [class size] is 50,” Tan said. 

The overall student-faculty ratio is calculated using a formula published by the U.S. News and World Report. Senior Director of News and Media Relations BJ Almond said it involves both full-time and part-time students and faculty. 

“The [student-faculty] ratio is the the ratio of full-time equivalent students plus one-third part-time students to full-time equivalent instructional faculty plus one-third part-time,” Almond said. 

Hutchinson said full-time equivalent faculty does not include those who are predominantly involved in teaching graduate-level students, teaching assistants, undergraduate assistants, faculty at the Jones School of Business or undergraduate student-taught courses. Part-time instructors are added on a fractional basis, according to Hutchinson. 

“At Rice, we have 617 faculty with full-time equivalence,” Hutchinson said. 

Full-time equivalent professors do not necessarily carry tenure, according to Hutchinson. He defined tenure as a continuing contract with the university throughout a professor’s career. 

“When hired initially, faculty are normally hired without tenure with the plan that they will get tenure,” Hutchinson said. “Faculty are expected to carry on scholarship throughout their years at Rice. Scholarship entails creative production, design or publication.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Anonymous
Tue Feb 19 2013 12:37
cooolllll
Anonymous
Tue Oct 9 2012 03:00
This poorly-written article fails to convey why a 6:1 faculty ratio matters, either positively or negatively. While it seems like there would be a general air of discontent in the article, the numbers seem to indicate that things are okay. E.g. "The average class size ... is 21 students, while the median is 13," seems to mean that there shouldn't be a problem.

Why not cover the intricacies of the problems of a 6:1 ratio, such as: it's hard to register for classes, departments have to spread their resources thinner, office hours are packed etc. Talk about the pains (and gains) of the situation as experienced by the community, not just what they perceive the numerical class sizes to be. (I.e. why does that perceived number matter? That would be interesting to know.)

The article also talks about tenure, but doesn't tie it in to the rest of the article. I'm left having to guess that it's connected to the hiring procedure, but even so, the article fails to actually explain how it affects the faculty numbers.

Mainly, I just don't understand "the point" of the article. Like many other Thresher articles, it makes us sound like we're just a bunch of whining undergraduates who don't know how good we have it.

Anonymous
Sun Oct 7 2012 05:09
I find this article to be very misleading in terms of which majors have "large" classes. As an econ major, picking electives in the spring is a challenge because literally ALL of them fill up before the middle/later registration periods. Several classmates of mine who are seniors could not get into 400 level electives like Health Econ because they reached capacity. All the university does is hire more faculty for the engineers without paying attention to social science/humanities majors that face the same problem, perhaps at a more severe degree.




log out